<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		xmlns:itunes="http://www.itunes.com/dtds/podcast-1.0.dtd"
	xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Reader Request &#8211; The Future of Record Labels</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.52shows.com/2007/10/17/reader-request-the-future-of-record-labels/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.52shows.com/2007/10/17/reader-request-the-future-of-record-labels/</link>
	<description>A live music blog written by and for regular folks.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 Feb 2012 04:06:18 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: john</title>
		<link>http://www.52shows.com/2007/10/17/reader-request-the-future-of-record-labels/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>john</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 18 Oct 2007 14:13:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.52shows.com/2007/10/17/reader-request-the-future-of-record-labels/#comment-98</guid>
		<description>Perhaps it goes without saying that these examples are all very successful artists- who have had the benefit of the major label machine working for them their entire careers. Because of that support they now have the freedom to do something different. 

I think what the Live Nation deal speaks to is the shift to a business model based on multiple revenue streams. Korn recently did a deal with Virgin in which the company&#039;s investment in the band is reciprocated with cut of the profits from  not only records, but touring and merch as well.

The music business is changing- and that the role of the label will change as well. But I think that labels will act in one way that they always have- as a filter. Similar to any construct in the music business. A way to try and make sense of an overwhelming number of choices.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Perhaps it goes without saying that these examples are all very successful artists- who have had the benefit of the major label machine working for them their entire careers. Because of that support they now have the freedom to do something different. </p>
<p>I think what the Live Nation deal speaks to is the shift to a business model based on multiple revenue streams. Korn recently did a deal with Virgin in which the company&#8217;s investment in the band is reciprocated with cut of the profits from  not only records, but touring and merch as well.</p>
<p>The music business is changing- and that the role of the label will change as well. But I think that labels will act in one way that they always have- as a filter. Similar to any construct in the music business. A way to try and make sense of an overwhelming number of choices.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

